My name is …, I’m a third year student midwife at X University and I am about to begin my literature review, I have decided to focus on vaginal breech birth. I haven’t finalised my question yet as I feel I need to read some more research to be able to word it correctly but I’m really interested in vaginal breech birth and practictoner skill. I’m ambitiously hoping my review might encourage the trust I work in to trial a breech birth team. I was wondering if you might be able to point me in the direction of any research regarding practitioner skill or breech birth teams? I understand we need much more research, but in your opinion is there any particular area that is really lacking in research that would support a move towards normalising vaginal breech births? I appreciate this is a very busy time for everyone having to work from home and understand you may not have time to respond to me at the moment but I’m so excited at the idea that don’t want to leave any stone unturned, any advice you have would be very appreciated.
Hope to hear from you soon!
(Thank you for permission to share this exchange.)
Thank you for your message and your interest.
I write about this topic constantly https://breechbirth.org.uk/publications/. My PhD thesis contains a section on it, although this is a few years old now. Reference lists to my publications will help get you started. We also include information on building competence in the Breech Birth Network on-line training.
You could do a literature review around midwives’ roles, any literature about competencies already out there, any evidence about the roles that midwives are taking, any evidence about outcomes associated with midwife-attended breech births (there is some in one of the TBT follow-up studies, I think by Su?).
My advice would be, whatever you do, treat it as a first step in becoming an expert in this area yourself. While it is great to try to convince your Trust they can do this, eventually, someone is going to need to actually put themselves on call and attend the births. So while you understandably feel at the beginning of a journey, see yourself as starting and committing to that journey, rather than trying to convince someone else to 😊 It may take years, but the breech revolution is a looooong-term game, requiring all of us to take small steps, with patience, but continuing to move forward, inch by inch. You will be constantly running into a wall. We turn to each other for support, do not give in to despair, and keep going. Eventually, enough of us running into the same wall will knock it down.
Another option is to do a review of outcomes associated with breech clinics and breech teams. This would be very valuable, but it will require a ‘no stone unturned’ approach indeed. This is because content about clinics and teams is usually embedded in articles, rather than listed as a key word. So you would have to do a general search on ‘breech presentation’ after 2000, eliminate obviously irrelevant articles and duplicates, then do searches on the words ‘team’ and ‘clinic’ and other related words such as ‘on-call’ and ‘stand-by,’ within the abstract and text of the articles themselves. It’s not as simple as a PICO search on randomised controlled trials, but it would pull together the general trends associated with clinics and teams (for ECV as well as VBB results), demonstrating a need for further research focusing on these as interventions themselves.
To that end, make sure you are using a Reference Management Software programme. I use Mendeley. If you are going to become a breech specialist yourself, you will need to be very familiar with the literature and have it easy to hand when you want to apply for funding or write up your work. Do that now and begin to build your library of evidence, organised to help you make your arguments.
And choose a topic that you are interested in going on to do further research about because a literature review is the first step. Aim to write a literature review that you can publish, even in a student midwife journal, but ideally more. You are not doing a ‘student midwife literature review.’ You are doing a literature review. There’s no reason your first go need be any less worthy than any medical or post-graduate student doing a literature review for the first time, many of which get published. Your work and your mind are just as worthy, and when you spend time doing something properly, you have insight others can learn from.
Once you graduate, begin to identify sources of funding for the next stages. Research/breech practice is a great combination because it gives you some flexibility (e.g. not responsible for as many clinics/shifts) and helps move practice forward.
If you’ve done our on-line training, you can begin to become involved in assisting with training through BBN. Continual review and engagement is the best way to continually develop your confidence. We have on-line seminars frequently.
Breech Birth in Yemen – what I learnt as an MSF Gynaecologist taking physiological breech birth from theory into practice
Dr Sabrina Das
Sabrina is a Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist at Imperial College Healthcare Trust in London. She worked in Yemen as an MSF Gynaecologist from March-July 2021.
In March 2021, I escaped the U.K. to a country where the biggest challenge in healthcare was not COVID-19. I took on a role in Yemen with Doctors Without Borders (MSF), working as an MSF gynaecologist in Taiz governorate. The hospital has been running since 2015, when Taiz City was divided in two by a frontline between the warring parties.
The conflict meant that there was no publicly run maternity hospital in Taiz Houban, as it was not safe for civilians to cross the frontline. Six years into this war (and no end in sight), Taiz Houban Mother and Child Hospital (MCH) is the largest maternity hospital in the region, and the largest MSF project in Yemen. We deliver 400-500 babies per month, and we mainly treat women with risk factors in pregnancy or who develop intrapartum complications. Breech presentation is one such risk factor.
In many high resource countries, breech presentation has become synonymous with Caesarean birth and most mothers opt for this, in spite of no evidence showing any difference in long-term outcome for babies. “Everybody says it is safer to have a Caesarean” is what many women tell me. Thus in London my experience with vaginal breech birth is mostly in the pre-term or second twin scenario. In my time in Yemen, however, I have delivered more vaginal breech babies than I had in my preceding 15-year career.
In Yemen, the word “safer” takes on a completely different meaning and perspective.
The average number of children a woman has is six. Many women get married and start their reproductive journeys in their teenage years, and carry on for the next 20 years. It is not unusual for women to have 12+ pregnancies. The conflict has devastated Yemen’s public healthcare provision, and very few can afford private antenatal care. Even if they could, the war has meant that there is a real shortage of skilled providers even in the private sector. There is no national screening programme. Many women will labour at home. Some labour with a private midwife and practices of private providers are unregulated. It is not uncommon for women to receive oxytocin in the home setting, whilst in labour, to speed things up.
The high fertility rate, lack of easy access to maternity hospitals with facilities for The high fertility rate, lack of easy access to maternity hospitals with facilities for emergency Caesarean, and unregulated practices occurring in the community make the risks of a Caesarean very high. The risks are not so much in the index pregnancy, but in future pregnancies. We have many women with previous Caesarean who attend with ruptured uteri after receiving oxytocin at home, or after labouring for some hours at home. We also have women experiencing the complications of multiple Caesarean births – dense adhesions and surgical issues, but more terrifying is the complication of abnormal placentation from previous Caesarean birth.
We had one woman who we saw in our high-risk clinic with a low lying placenta, and a history of two previous Caesarean births. She also had two previous vaginal births. Only two of her four children were alive. We brought her back to have a planned Caesarean the following day, and on entry, found that the placenta had invaded through the previous uterine scar (a complication called placenta accreta). I delivered the baby and had to perform a hysterectomy. She received six units of blood. She is lucky to be alive. If she had bled at home or gone into labour before finding a hospital to do her Caesarean, she would have died.
We saw another woman who was about 18 years old. She had a 5-month old baby, and got pregnant immediately after her period returned about 2 months prior. She turned out to have an ectopic pregnancy in her Caesarean section scar. It was quite large, about 5cm by 5cm and she bled a lot during the treatment (I evacuated the pregnancy via the cervix). I was seriously afraid she would need a hysterectomy. This is a serious consequence for a young woman in any culture, but my Yemeni colleagues tell me it can be particularly devastating here, where a woman’s status in her husband’s family can be dependent on her potential to have more children. We were lucky this time and she will be back, pregnant, in the not too distant future I expect.
I had to explain the backdrop in Yemen for you to understand that here, Caesarean is not an inconsequential operation. The risks to mothers of complications directly or indirectly related to a Caesarean birth are huge. The relatively small benefit to the baby demonstrated by the Term Breech Trial (2000) do not justify a policy of elective Caesarean breech delivery in this context. Thus, it is common and routine for us to induce women with breech presentation (for all the usual indications), and if a woman presents in labour with a breech baby, we manage them exactly as we would with a head down baby. This includes giving oxytocin to augment labour if needed (especially in first-time mums).
Women here do not have any access to pain relief in labour or continuous monitoring. There isn’t even gas and air!
The lack of regional anaesthetic would make an upright breech vaginal birth an ideal option for women, but the standard practice here is for women to deliver in lithotomy position. Culturally, women in labour tend to lie flat on their beds, usually hooked up to an intravenous drip for some reason. Believe me, every time I do a ward round I sound like a broken record, “Get her up and moving – tell her lying flat is not good for her baby!” And at delivery, I get the women to try going on all fours position. For the breech births, I have had most women (including primiparous women) delivering beautifully on all fours, where nothing more was needed than some verbal encouragement. I was really happy this week, however, when the skills I had learnt from physiological breech training helped with what could otherwise have been a tricky breech birth. .
A mother came in fully dilated, with her second baby in the breech position. Lots of women come to hospital fully dilated and this is not a good thing. The conflict means that women sometimes have to wait until it is safe to travel, or they have trouble accessing transport, or issues like roadblocks and the closure of local services mean they just have really long journeys to get here. Without any idea of what the fetal heart rate has been doing in the preceding hours, without any clue about what medication the woman may have received at home, what has her blood pressure been… I have seen it go wrong far too many times before.
This particular mother was immediately brought to the delivery room, and the midwife explained she had heard a deceleration. We checked the fetal heart and there was definitely a bradycardia going on. I immediately got her onto all fours position and got her to push. The rump advanced to the perineum and I could see the abdomen emerging, and the legs shortly afterwards. I didn’t see the “valley of the cord” as the baby was slightly misaligned so I corrected this with a little rotation. I could hear the mantra “don’t tell the woman to ‘just breathe and wait for the next contraction’”, particularly with the concerns over the fetal heart. So I went ahead and delivered the anterior arm and proceeded confidently with a shoulder press. It worked like magic and the baby was born. Baby started crying after a few minutes on the resuscitaire, and was good as gold by the time we cleaned mum up. The best bit for me was presenting the gorgeous girl to her mother. I told her, “jameel” which means “beautiful”. It is one of the few Arabic words I know. She kissed her hand and touched mine, and without words we shared a moment of connection.
Not all my breech stories are so successful. We had another woman who had four children (all alive) who came in at term with a breech baby in spontaneous labour. She laboured to full dilatation and was pushing for a long time, about two hours. By the time I got involved, she was exhausted and asking for a Caesarean. We persevered for another 30 minutes. She had been in lithotomy, so we got her on the floor. Squatting, kneeling, McRobert’s… we tried all positions possible. The baby’s bum was visible without even parting the labia, but it was not budging. We brought her into theatre and did a Caesarean. On the operating table before starting, I noticed minimal urine in the catheter tubing and what was there was a deep blood-red. Her abdomen was a crescent shape, and looked sunken in on one side. She had the most obstructed labour I had ever seen. The lower segment of her uterus was so distended it looked bruised, almost like a large purple mass. The bladder was extremely oedematous. The baby was not excessively big (3.4kg) but for some reason, the way his bum was fitting in the pelvis, it was malpositioned in some way and there was no way he was coming down. The long second stage in a multiparous women, and all the other outward signs of obstructed labour should have been singing to me.
I saw a similar woman the following day with an intrauterine fetal death at term. We induced her and she was in second stage for about four hours. We were not keen to do a Caesarean for a baby who had already died but in her case it was obstructed. To avoid a ruptured uterus, a Caesarean was the right thing to do for the mum.
So, here’s a summary of what I have learnt about breech birth working alongside my very skilled Yemeni colleagues here in Taiz:
Upright position is fab, as is the lack of regional anaesthetic for a breech birth. That Ferguson’s reflex is a really helpful thing to help the rump deliver. The manoeuvres work a charm once the woman has gotten herself past that point of “no return”. Up to that point, however, you can’t do anything to speed things up apart from verbal encouragement.
If the rump is not delivering, particularly in a multiparous woman, things are not going well and the breech might be malpositioned in some way. Do not start oxytocin in this case (especially if she had been contracting well before). Any sudden cessation of contractions is not a good sign and should prompt an assessment for rupture of the uterus. I would recommend a Caesarean after about two hours of active pushing in second stage for multiparous women.
You can induce or augment a woman with a breech baby just like you can when the baby is cephalic. The same rules apply – look for adequate progress, monitor as you would with a cephalic baby for fetal distress or hyperstimulation, and be wary of augmenting multiparous women who are in spontaneous labour (they are at risk of uterine rupture).
I think that if healthcare professionals follow these simple rules, breech vaginal birth is just as safe as a cephalic vaginal birth in any setting.
Breech Birth Network are pleased to announce the publication of an evaluation of our physiological breech birth training, conducted in eight NHS hospitals across England and Northern Ireland. Click on the image below to read the full evaluation.
Multi-disciplinary training, involving NHS midwives and obstetricians
Only training to have demonstrated an increase, rather than a decrease, in vaginal breech births following delivery of the training package, although this was not statistically significant
Use of upright positions at birth increased significantly
Pilot data: no adverse outcomes among births attended by someone who had completed the training, compared to a background rate of 7%
Pilot data: perineal outcomes similar to cephalic births
Congratulations to midwife Stella Mattiolo, who collected and analysed this data as part of her Masters in Research.
25th June 1.30pm – The ‘Dropped Foot’ Baby in Labour
2nd July 1.30pm – Nuchal cords and vaginal breech births
14th July 6.30pm – ‘Buttock Lift’ for the birth of the fetal buttocks
To join one of the seminars listed above or any other which will be run over the course of the year, please see open the course in which you are enrolled.
Breech Birth Network, CIC is dedicated to training Midwives and Obstetricians of all levels in physiological breech birth and developing research exploring key breech birth issues. As well as running full days face-to-face training on physiological breech birth, our well attended and evaluated course is now available online. The course has been developed directly from research about physiological breech birth and can be accessed via this link.
To support the learning and development following completion of the online course, Breech Birth Network, CIC are now running live reflective sessions with an instructor. These group sessions will be run virtually and provide an opportunity to discuss important issues and clinical situations related to physiological breech birth. The sessions will be held on Zoom and facilitated by Dr Shawn Walker and Emma Spillane. The seminars are a chance for those who have attended the Breech Birth Network online training course to discuss issues related to practice, further understand some more unique scenarios and how to manage these in practice.
The seminars are an opportunity for healthcare professionals to come together and discuss all things breech! Each seminar will have a main topic or theme, but the conversation will be led by those attending. You can ask questions; discuss births you have attended and reflect on scenarios in practice.
Should we screen for nuchal cord using ultrasound when a woman is planning a vaginal breech birth? and
What should we do with the information if we do identify a nuchal cord on ultrasound?
‘Nuchal cord’ means that one or more loops of umbilical cord are wrapped around the baby’s neck, during pregnancy or birth. Checking for nuchal cord prior to external cephalic version (ECV) or during risk assessment prior to a vaginal breech birth (VBB) is both common and controversial.
What is known:
Nuchal cords are common, especially for breech presentation. For example, in this study (Wong & Ludmir, 2006), where someone specifically looked for a nuchal cord prior to an attempt at ECV, 34/75 (45.3%) babies were spotted wearing their cord as a necklace. They attempted the ECVs without this information. More babies with nuchal cords had transient (temporary) heart rate abnormalities, and their ECVs were less likely to be successful. But none of them had an emergency caesarean birth because of the way their heart rate was affected by attempting ECV.
It may cause problems in some pregnancies and/or births, but visual assessment by ultrasound does NOT help us to predict which ones. (… in general. Unless, as in this paper by Hinkson et al 2019, there are 6 loops of nuchal cord visible. Wow!)
What is not known: Does a nuchal cord increase the risk associated with an ECV or vaginal breech birth? We just don’t know if, or by how much, presence of a nuchal cord increases the risk. This is one reason neither of the RCOG guidelines (ECV, Management of Breech) indicate nuchal cord should be identified, or used as an exclusion criteria, for either of these. In fact, they don’t mention ‘nuchal cord’ or ‘cord around the neck’ at all.
When there is clinical uncertainty, we just say … there is clinical uncertainty. We can’t guarantee it won’t be a problem, but we have no clear evidence that it is likely to cause a problem.
Other guidelines often do say something like, “exclude nuchal cord.” This means, “Look for it with ultrasound to make sure it isn’t there.” But it’s not clear what one is supposed to do if you identify it IS there. And if a clinician has not looked for it, or has not spotted it, and it ends up being there and causing a problem during birth, have they been negligent? It’s a slippery slope.
In my own clinical experience, breech babies born vaginally quite often have one or sometimes two loops of nuchal cord around their neck at birth. My gut feeling is that these babies more often needed help to flex the head, for example with a shoulder press, but that this was not more difficult than when the cord is not there.
I also checked our video study (Reitter, Halliday & Walker 2020) database of 42 breech births with ‘good’ outcomes. Among these, 8/42 (19%) had a cord wrapped at least once around the neck. Among these 8, 5/8 had help with the arms, and 6/8 had help to flex the head. This was slightly higher than the overall averages in the whole dataset. In the dataset, there were also 2 cases of leg entanglement, 1 case of arm entanglement, and 1 cord prolapse, where the cord comes out first.
It seems plausible that cord entanglement, whether around the neck or another body part, could interfere with the normal mechanisms of a vaginal breech birth. These babies may then require more assistance to be born safely, which is not itself a problem, as long as that assistance is provided in a timely fashion. It also seems plausible that in some case, a tight or short cord entanglement could cause problems that would put the baby at risk. But the kind of potential problems Peesay describes are all very likely to be picked up with the kind of close monitoring (growth scans, fetal heart rate monitoring, etc.) that every known breech baby received antenatally and/or in labour.
Another NICE Guideline that mentions care for breech presentation has been put out for comment. This time it is Inducing Labour. Many fine colleagues are collating responses to the guideline in general, but I would like views on the specific section related to induction of labour in breech presentation.
I have prepared a response, based on previous feedback from women and birthing people. Please let us know how you feel about this, and whether you would word anything differently.
Induction of labour is controversial, and even more controversial for breech presentation. I have tried to word the response in such a way that reflects the need for more informed choice, rather than more induction per se.
p.10, line 6 “Induction of labour is not generally recommended if a woman’s baby is in the breech position. [2008, amended 2021]” Cannot locate evidence for this recommendation in evidence review. This statement is vague. Not generally recommended by who? Why? Induction of labour for breech presentation is common outside of the UK.
p.10, line 5 Suggest the section on ‘Breech Presentation’ is re-written to reflect the ethos of informed choice and discussion, in a similar manner to the section on ‘Previous caesarean birth.’ Otherwise, the service is inequitable. A guideline on IOL with breech presentation is only applicable to women who have chosen to plan a vaginal breech birth. The guideline should reflect and respect this, using neutral, non-judgemental language.
1.2.19 Advise women with a baby in the breech position, who have chosen to plan a vaginal breech birth, that:
induction of labour could lead to an increased risk of emergency caesarean birth, compared to spontaneous breech labour
induction of labour could lead to an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission for the baby, compared to spontaneous breech labour
the methods used for induction of labour will be guided by the need to reduce these risks. See the recommendations on Methods for inducing labour.
1.2.20 If delivery is indicated, offer women who have a baby in the breech position a choice of:
an attempt at external cephalic version, immediately followed by induction of labour if successful
caesarean birth or
induction of labour in breech presentation
Take into account the woman’s circumstances and preferences. Advise women that they are entitled to decline the offer of treatment such as external cephalic version, induction of labour or caesarean birth, even when it MAY benefit their or their baby’s heath.
Current wording in Draft Guideline is:
1.2.19 Induction of labour is not generally recommended if a woman’s baby is in the breech position. [2008, amended 2021]
1.2.20 Consider induction of labour for babies in the breech position if:
delivery is indicated and
external cephalic version is unsuccessful, declined or contraindicated and
the woman chooses not to have an elective caesarean birth.
Discuss the possible risks associated with induction with the woman. [2008, amended 2021]
El servicio de Obstetricia del Hospital Sant Pau se caracteriza por su amplia trayectoria en la asistencia integral al parto de nalgas mediante una atención multidisciplinar.
El objetivo de esta jornada es dar a conocer la asistencia al parto de nalgas y sus alternativas así como cualificar a los profesionales que lo deseen para atender un parto de nalgas y aprender a resolver posibles complicaciones.
Para ello contaremos con expertas internacionales con amplia experiencia en la asistencia al parto de nalgas.
La inscripción incluye documentación del curso, traducción simultánea de las ponencias en inglés y diploma de asistencia. Inscripción de a la Jornada a partir del enlace:
This week, the NIHR (UK based) announced a PhD Fellowship opportunity. A Fellowship is designed to support a researcher to gain experience and training in doing research, and to support the research itself. It’s a great opportunity. Advertisement pasted below.
If you are reading this after any of these calls have closed, the same organisations may have a more recent call.
NIHR-Wellbeing of Women Doctoral Fellowships (Round 6)
Provide the opportunity to undertake exciting and impactful research that will underpin a researcher’s development as an independent future leader. The Doctoral Fellowship funds researchers to undertake a PhD
Wellbeing of Women is delighted to have partnered with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to jointly fund one Charity Partnership Doctoral Fellowship.
All NIHR Fellowships provide the opportunity to undertake exciting and impactful research that will underpin a researcher’s development as an independent future leader. The Doctoral Fellowship funds researchers to undertake a PhD.
NIHR Charity Partnership Fellowships offer researchers the opportunity to be part of an active and supportive community, drawing on the enormous benefits and opportunities of cross-sector working.
If you are considering training to be a researcher and/or clinical academic who does breech research, we would love to hear from you. There are many challenges in breech research. For example, variations in when the breech is diagnosed make recruitment challenging. Sometimes dramatic variations exist between centres in external cephalic version success rates, vaginal breech birth experience and whether or not breech presentation has a dedicated care pathway. This can make recruiting sites difficult, and it is difficult to reach an adequate sample size within single-centre studies. But we have experience in navigating some of these challenges and are keen to collaborate with others.
For example, in the OptiBreech Project, we are building a database designed to support a large, multi-site observational cohort study with multiple embedded trials along the breech care pathway. Some of the questions women or potential researchers have told us would be useful to answer include:
Does moxibustion work in a UK context, and what does it cost? This could be tested as a trial within the cohort.
Rebozo sifting / positional exercises / homeopathy / hypnosis — do they influence the rate at which babies turn head-down, or the success rate of external cephalic version? This could be tested as a trial within the cohort.
Does provision of an ECV service by a Breech Specialist Midwife change the outcomes of the service? And what does it cost compared to an obstetric service? This could be tested as a trial within the cohort.
Should we offer cervical sweeps to women with breech-presenting babies? Are they helpful? Safe? From when should we offer them? This could be tested as a trial within the cohort.
Does offering induction of labour for women with a breech-presenting baby who desire a vaginal breech birth affect modes of birth and/or outcomes? This could be tested as a trial within the cohort
If you’d like to consider applying for this or another source of funding for breech research, you are welcome to be in touch to discuss!
From 1 May 2021, access to the Physiological Breech Birth video library on Vimeo, hosted by Breech Birth Network, will only be available through our on-line training programme.
Although we’ve always offered a year’s access with training, we’ve never changed the password. But it’s been over a year since we have been able to deliver any in-person study days.
If you have purchased the on-line training, you will have access to the complete training for a year, as well as the Vimeo video library. The password to the library will be posted within the training programme, so you can continue to access the videos you use in training. If you attend an in-person training, you will be given access to the on-line training for one year.
If your organisation uses our videos, someone from your organisation will need to be enrolled onto our on-line course. Institutional rates are available if you would like all of your staff to have access to the course and the video library.
Thank you for making such good use of the training materials we’ve worked hard to create. May the breech babies find you and be safe in your hands.
Emma and I frequently receive requests for elective placements from students keen to experience midwifery practice related to breech birth. We wrote this post to provide some guidance into what you can do if you would like to gain more breech exposure.
Elective placements are tricky for a number of reasons:
At the moment, COVID-19.
A lot of administrative paperwork for a short placement.
We need to prioritise students from our local universities.
Direct work with women with a breech-presenting baby is only a small part of what we do.
No guarantee there would be any breech births during this period and/or that permission would be given for you to attend.
You will not be able to gain hands-on experience on an elective placement.
If you would like to spend your elective placement learning more about working with breech presentation, our on-line course is a great place to start. You will gain more exposure to the way breech births work, in a shorter period of time, than most midwives do in their careers. You will gain insight into how women and birthing people can be counselled to ensure informed decision-making. And you will learn how others have implemented change to the way breech works in their local hospitals.
You could structure your own elective placement, including the following:
Working with your local practice development midwives to attend any local training provided to qualified midwives, doctors or medical students, for example mandatory training activities.
Arranging to observe local counselling for breech presentation in your antenatal clinic. This may require you to liaise with the Antenatal Clinic Matron to find out about the local breech care pathway.
Attending presentation scans. You will need to find out where and by whom these are done in your local unit.
Observing external cephalic versions. Where and by whom are these done in your local unit?
Make a video about some aspect of breech management. If we include it in our training, you get lifetime access for free! Think about what women you encounter need more information about. Or what your fellow students need to learn about breech that you have learned through your placement. Practice finding evidence-based answers to the questions posted to these forums.
Writing a commentary article for a midwifery practice journal, such as TPM’s Student Midwife, summarising your self-made elective placement and what you learned.
Finding out the answers to all of these questions and/or completing these activities will give you insight into how the breech care pathway works for the women you care for. In some locations, this care is provided through an organised clinic and the path is clear. In other sites, care is more fragmented, and it may be harder to determine what the pathway is. But this in itself is useful because you will be able to see the work that needs to be done!
Another benefit of crafting your own placement in your local setting is that, when your colleagues know of your interest in breech, you are more likely to be involved in actual breech births. This is called “attracting breeches,” and you can read more about it in this research.
We are very keen to support students but need to be realistic about how we might be able to do that at the moment.
— Shawn and Emma
Image: Danish midwifery student Pernille Ravn on her elective placement, demonstrating the movement of baby to mother’s abdomen when performing the shoulder press manoeuvre